[ Sandy/NASAChatHost - 0 - 11:11:52 ]
Welcome to another NASA QUEST Mars Chat! Exobiologist Jack Farmer will be here
to answer your questions at 2:30 p.m., Pacific. Be sure to read his newly updated
(as of today!) bio at-- http://quest.arc.nasa.gov/sso/team/farmer.html
[ Sandy/NASAChatHost - 1 - 14:26:22 ]
DID YOU KNOW??? The reason that Jack studies hot springs is because they are excellent
environments to fossilize microorganisms. Hot springs are also natural places
to explore for fossil life on Mars. Jack has been looking at images of the surface
of Mars for the most likely spots for ancient hot-spring deposits.
[ Sandy/NASAChatHost - 2 - 14:28:40 ]
DO YOU KNOW WHY Jack's nickname in high school was "Stoney"?
[ Sandy/NASAChatHost - 4 - 14:31:56 ]
RE: [Vince/Boeing-Vince/Boeing] Hi Jack and Sandy
Hi Vince! Glad you could join us! The chat will begin momentarily... I know you've
got your questions ready :-)
[ Sandy/NASAChatHost - 6 - 14:35:55 ]
RE: [David-Mars2012/UniversityofCalifornia] Hello,
Jack! My name is David Gan, a retired Public Health Microbiologist with the California
State Health Dept and now a mentor to UC Berkeley Marsby2012 HEDS-UP projects.
I was at the Planetary Society Conference at Houston in May and the Mars Society
Conference at Boulder few weeks ago. Professor Larry and I gave a lecture of Triple
Point of Water near Mars conditions to see if liquid water can appear at times
on the surface. I did a bell jar experiment in my kitchen with dry ice, vacuum
pump and ice cubes and found indeed, liquid water can exist at warmer temperatures.
Welcome David! How wonderful that you are a Marsby2012 HEDS-UP mentor! Hope you
have some good questions ready for Jack!
[ JackFarmer/Exobiologist - 8 - 14:36:32
]
Hello everyone! I'm here and ready to chat. I'll start with David. Your experiments
with water sound fascinating. Sounds like something I could effectively use in
my classes here at ASU!
[ JackFarmer/Exobiologist - 10 - 14:39:20
]
RE: [Vince/Boeing-Vince/Boeing] 1. Given a Mars/Earth
parallel 'life' evolution what sort of fossil or live organisms would you expect
to find on Mars today?
Hi Vince, To answer your question I think its important to emphasize that life
on Earth began as microbial and remained so for the first 85% of Earth history.
Only about 600 million years ago did complex multicelled life arise. Given that
we think Mars was most clement for life early in the planet's history, it is probably
reasonable to assume we are looking for simple, unicelled forms.
[ JackFarmer/Exobiologist - 12 - 14:41:27
]
RE: [David-Mars2012/UniversityofCalifornia] Hi,
It is important to show that liquid water because most life, or all life depends
on it. Accordingly, I have built a Conceptual Model of a Robotics Laboratory to
culture bacteria from Martian subsurface water. I will challenge UC Berkeley students
in Engineering (Robotics) Computer Science , Astronomy and Biological Sciences
majors to make this thing a reality for the 2003 Mars Mission.
David, Yes! Liquid water is key. Water is such a remarkable substance and we rarely
hear people talk about it. In my lecture courses I have started focusing on the
properties of water that make it so essential for life. It provides an important
context which drives a lot of what we are doing in exploration.
[ JackFarmer/Exobiologist - 15 - 14:45:38
]
RE: [David-Mars2012/UniversityofCalifornia] Hi One
of the first things we will attempt to culture for are Archea (methane, iron,
sulfur, halophiles and thermophiles) as well as Eubacteria. I think we may find
pseudomonads. As part of my experience with the State Health Department work in
investigating deep ground water flora, we have found bacteria still unidentified,
Protist such as Arcella and even nematodes. So, there is a short food chain going
on down there. We may find the same on Mars!
David, i guess I'm not surprised to hear about what you have been finding. My
colleague Todd Steven at the NW Pacific Labs has been working on the microbiology
of deep aquifers in the Columbia River Basalt. He has found many species and metabolic
strategies, including chemolithoautotrophs that utilize hydrogen liberated by
the aqueous weathering of basalt. These types of organisms hold special interest
for Mars as they require no surface productivity whatsoever. If life is present
on Mars today we think it may be in deep aquifers several kms beneath the surface,
and below a thick layer on confining ground ice.
[ JackFarmer/Exobiologist - 18 - 14:50:59
]
RE: [Vince/Boeing-Vince/Boeing] Considering the
gravitational and environmental differences between Mars and Earth but a parallel
'life' evolution. How do you feel similar structures would differ in the two worlds.
ie.... stromatolites?
Hi Vince, The differences between the Earth and Mars are substantial and yes,
I do think that if life developed there, the details of its evolution will certainly
reflect the contrasting environments. It is hard to know what to expect with samll
microbial things, however. They live at such small spatial scales that viscous
forces would undoubtedly dominate over gravity forces anyway and the physical
effects on form could be minimal. On the other hand, metabolic strategies could
be markedly different given that the Martian crust has chemistry more like basalt
and very limited aqueous weathering to liberate soluable compounds like phosphorous
which are an important requirement for living systems as we know them.
[ Sandy/NASAChatHost - 19 - 14:51:46 ]
RE: [Marko-MarkoStahl/BadSchnbornGermany] Hi Sandy
and Jack,... a little late due to "typing problems.
No problem Marko! We're glad you're here! Do you some questions for Jack?
[ Sandy/NASAChatHost - 24 - 14:55:29 ]
RE: [Bob-BobClark] Hello, Dr. Farmer. I sent you
today via e-mail a suggestion that the dark structures in the recent Mars Surveyor
images from Aug. 10th could be stromatolites. The explanation on the MGS page
were that they were patterns (flat) on the ice. But the video of the news conference
on the images suggest that have a height. Have you seen these images, Professor?
Welcome Bob! And, good question!
[ JackFarmer/Exobiologist - 25 - 14:56:12
]
RE: [David-Mars2012/UniversityofCalifornia] I would
like to know what efforts are made to search for life on Mars. I know that the
Open University of Great Britain, Colin Pilinger is doing something, but I heard
they will use the GCMS method like the Viking Mission, which turned out to be
not sufficiently sensitive to organics. Has anyone consider the direct culture
method (the old fashion way) and observe with micrscopy for motility, morphology,
mode of reproduction, enzymatic activity...???
Hi David, The currrent Mars Program in the US has placed an emphasis on searching
for fossil biosignatures in rocks. The general concensus in the community is that
conditions on Mars are probably to extreme for life, thus explaining the results
of the Viking biology experiments. If you recall the Viking landers carried GCMS
experiments that could have detected organic compounds in soils at one part in
a billion. Not one carbon-containing molecule was found! That suggests that the
soil chemistry easily destroys organics (you would expect something, even if life
never developed becuase of infalls of organic rich dust and carbonaceous chondrites
from space). Direct ciulturing is not being seriously considered except for returned
samples to mainly check for harmful bugs or forward contamination by Earth critters
during sample collection.
[ JackFarmer/Exobiologist - 26 - 14:58:44
]
RE: [David-Mars2012/UniversityofCalifornia] One
of my concerns, is of the Public Health nature. If we do find microbes there,
we may return some "Opportunistic" organisms which may turn out to be "Andromeda
Strains". So I feel that Robotics Laboratory testing is essential. If bacteria,
etc are found, pathogenicity tests should be done with animals by manned laboratory
ON MARS and not returned to Earth. Any feeling on this?
Dear David, Your concerns about planetary protection are justified. NASA is spending
a lot of time and money preparing for the planned Mars sample return mission in
2005 (samples will actually get here in 2008). The current plan is to contain
the samples and place them in a Class 3 or 4 containment facility until they are
certified safe. Much planning is in the works and there is lots to be done still.
But at least NASA and the International community at large is thinking about the
issue!
[ JackFarmer/Exobiologist - 29 - 15:01:25
]
RE: [Vince/Boeing-Vince/Boeing] Is it possible that
in Mars's atmosphere 'water vapor clouds' contain some forms of microscopic life?
(As I would imagine clouds on Earth do)
Vince, I guess anything is possible. certainly we know there are many airborne
organisms on Earth. Most are not viable or are transported as spores. But we know
organisms can survive in the atmosphere for long periods, so this is certainly
a possibility. the only problem I have is where would they be coming from? Most
surface environments could be deemed unfavorable for life, so we have to worry
about sources.
[ JackFarmer/Exobiologist - 31 - 15:04:12
]
RE: [Bob-BobClark] Hello, Dr. Farmer. I sent you
today via e-mail a suggestion that the dark structures in the recent Mars Surveyor
images from Aug. 10th could be stromatolites. The explanation on the MGS page
were that they were patterns (flat) on the ice. But the video of the news conference
on the images suggest that have a height. Have you seen these images, Professor?
Hi Bob, I have yet to look at the most recent images you are referring to, but
have seen some of the other MOC images. In general I think these these laminated
structures are at a scale to large to call stromatolites. It is easier to image
them as layers of ice alternating with dust fallout from storms. this is how they
have been interpreted in the past and I have seen nothing yet to challenge that
interpretation.
[ JackFarmer/Exobiologist - 34 - 15:07:13
]
RE: [Marko-MarkoStahl/BadSchnbornGermany] You often
collected samples in Yellowstone Park. Does that mean that sulfolobus and its
"fellows" doesn't like laboratory conditions?
Hi Marko, Sulfolobus and related organisms have been successfully cultured, and
you don't even need to go to Yellowstone to get samples (you can buy pure cultures
from the American Type Culture Collection). The reason I dom a lot of my work
in the field is because I am really interested in how the organisms interact with
geological processes, such as mineral precipitation. While some of this can be
done in the lab, there is really no substitute for field work. For one thing,
while you can isolate an organism and grow it in the lab, in nature these species
live in ecosystems that are much more difficult to emulate in the lab.
[ Sandy/NASAChatHost - 36 - 15:08:15 ]
RE: [Karen-KarenMeyers/RMSCGVSU] Hi, Sandy & Jack
- I will be working with K-12 teachers and students as they develop their plans
for the Mars Millennium initative (where students create projects related to a
Mars Colony for 100 persons in the year 2030). There is considerable discussion
so far about the presence of underground water or lakes. Would this water be accessible
for use by a colony? What types of water purification equipment might be needed
it it was?
Hi Karen! Glad you could join us today!
[ JackFarmer/Exobiologist - 37 - 15:09:52
]
RE: [David-Mars2012/UniversityofCalifornia] I agree.
The surface environment is pretty hostile to life, but Dr. Frances Westall NASA
JSC suggests that "Life will find a way" and bacteria may have protective shields.
My feeling is that we will have better chance of finding life is in the subsurface
water environment. So, we have to drill for water samples for cultivation.
David, Frances is a colleague and I understand her arguments. But to me the science
has to be by observation. Just saying life will find a way involves a leap of
faith I am unwilling to take. True, there are organisms here on earth that make
their own sunscreen pigments to protect against UV, etc. But we have not been
able to culture organisms under present Mars conditions, so if life has found
a way, it has not yet done so on Earth! I say lets look and see!
[ JackFarmer/Exobiologist - 38 - 15:11:29
]
RE: [Marko-MarkoStahl/BadSchnbornGermany] Are there
other species than cyanobacteriae that can build stromatolites?
Hi Marko, Yes, other bacteria can also build laminated structures. So can algae.
Its just that (with a few exceptions) most of the stromatolite-like structures
we find in the record resemble most the structures built by living cyanobacteria.
[ JackFarmer/Exobiologist - 39 - 15:14:09
]
RE: [Vince/Boeing-Vince/Boeing] If organisms are
found on Mars would they be scientifically named/classified using the Earth model
or would a new scheme have to be devised?
Hi Vince, I suppose that if we found an organism in a Martian sample, the starting
point would be to compare it directly to terrestrial species. We would probably
begin with its genetic machinery to see if it also uses a DNA-RNA based system.
If so, then we would sequence its DNA and try and fit it into the eixiting phylogenetic
tree. If no comparisons could be drawn then I guess we would have to invent a
descriptive system to convey the similarities and differences.
[ Sandy/NASAChatHost - 41 - 15:15:02 ]
RE: [Karen-KarenMeyers/RMSCGVSU] Hi, Sandy & Jack
- I will be working with K-12 teachers and students as they develop their plans
for the Mars Millennium initative (where students create projects related to a
Mars Colony for 100 persons in the year 2030). There is considerable discussion
so far about the presence of underground water or lakes. Would this water be accessible
for use by a colony? What types of water purification equipment might be needed
it it was?
Karen: If you haven't done so yet, be sure to check out the upcoming "Mars Millennium
Project Surviving & Thriving on Mars" webcast/chat on Sept. 28 at 10 am, Pacific.
For further info go to:http://quest.arc.nasa.gov/ltc/mars/index.html
[ JackFarmer/Exobiologist - 43 - 15:17:35
]
RE: [David-Mars2012/UniversityofCalifornia] Jack,
What do you think of the liquid water found inside the Texas meteorite halide
crystals? They could host halophiles?
Hi David, The Texas meteorite is indeed interesting! The halite indicates that
aqueous weathering processes were operating in the nebula where the object accreted.
I doubt that we can get much beyond that. certainly we know that salt crystals
entrap lots of organisms and fluids when they form on Earth. I expect that one
of the first things scientists did in looking at the fluids entrapped in the halite
of that meteroite was to look for organic materials. If they have found such things
I have not heard. Personally I would be surprised.
[ JackFarmer/Exobiologist - 44 - 15:19:20
]
RE: [David-Mars2012/UniversityofCalifornia] Jack,
Gil Levin still believes that he has found evidence of life on Martian soil in
his Viking Labelled Release Experiment. What do you think of it?
Dear David, I have heard Gil's arguments many times. I am not at all convinced.
What is missing for me is a compelling reason why the results obtained can't be
entirely inorganic. I guess others feel similarly and that is why is view is in
the minority.
[ Sandy/NASAChatHost - 46 - 15:20:20 ]
THERE ARE ABOUT 15 MINUTES LEFT in today's chat with Jack. One favor, at the end
of the chat, please fill out a short chat survey and let us know what you think
about Quest Chats. The short survey can be found at: http://quest.arc.nasa.gov/qchats/qchat-surveys.
Thank you!
[ JackFarmer/Exobiologist] - 47 - 15:22:41]
RE: [Karen-KarenMeyers/RMSCGVSU]Hi, Sandy & Jack
- I will be working with K-12 teachers and students as they develop their plans
for the Mars Millennium initative (where students create projects related to a
Mars Colony for 100 persons in the year 2030). There is considerable discussion
so far about the presence of underground water or lakes. Would this water be accessible
for use by a colony? What types of water purification equipment might be needed
it it was?
Hi Karen, Welcome! The main problem with using Martiuan groundwater is that if
it is there (remains to be proven although the idea is reasonable based on models)
then it is likely to be 4-5 kms down and we will have to drill to reach it. This
is unlikely to be done before human missions, but once we have astronauts on the
surface, I would think this will be one of their most important scientific tasks.
It would probably be easier to access ground ice and melt it for water. That will
be much near the surface, or actually at the surface at latitudes higher than
about 40 degrees.
[ JackFarmer/Exobiologist - 48 - 15:25:01
]
RE: [Marko-MarkoStahl/BadSchnbornGermany] Jack,
in borehole projects bacteria are claimed to be found several kilometers deep
in the earth crust. If this is really true, do You have an idea how they managed
to get there?
Hi Marko, Most of the best studies subsurafce bacteria are in sediments that were
deposited at the surface and have been subsequently buried by a thick mantle of
younger deposits. In that case, the microbes may have been deposited with the
sediments. But this is hard to prove in most cases because groundwater may circulate
down from the surface also carrying microbes.
[ JackFarmer/Exobiologist - 50 - 15:26:54
]
RE: [David-Mars2012/UniversityofCalifornia] Jack,
Have you heard of a nanopore technique to search for general long chain polyers...ss
DNA and ss RNA by Professor David Deamer of UC Santa Cruz? I think it may be a
promising method to search for evidence of life.
Dear David, Dave Deamer is a good colleague and I very much respect his work.
Although I have not heard of the nanopore method, it sounds fascinating and I
expect if Dave thinks it will work he is someone to listen to!
[ JackFarmer/Exobiologist - 52 - 15:31:20
]
RE: [Vince/Boeing-Vince/Boeing] I've heard that
the Apollo astronauts found Earth 'stow-away' bacteria on the Surveyor lander
on the moon….If so, are they still there? How have they adapted to the moon environment?
Hi Vince, You are right about forward contamination of the moon during Apollo.
Despite our efforts to clean things, we transported lots of microbes on spacecraft
components (and on astronauts) which are likely still there. When a camera we
left on the moon for about 2 years was returned it still had Earth organisms present
that could be revived. the lesson here is that simple microbes may be able to
survive for long periods in space. How long is unclear, but it is something we
need to know more about because some people think that microbes might have been
transported to Earth from Mars (or even vise versa) on meteorites.
[ Sandy/NASAChatHost - 53 - 15:31:24 ]
EVERYONE: I'm sorry to say that there are only about 2 minutes left to chat with
Jack. He will finish answering a question or two and then we'll have to let him
get back to his real work!
[ Sandy/NASAChatHost - 54 - 15:32:43 ]
EVERYONE: Please spend a few minutes filling out the short chat survey at: http://quest.arc.nasa.gov/qchats/qchat-surveys.
Thanks!
[ JackFarmer/Exobiologist - 55 - 15:33:39
]
RE: [David-Mars2012/UniversityofCalifornia] As far
as you know, are there any efforts considered or made to culture bacteria from
Martian water? I recall that Dr. Wolf Vishniac had designed a lab to culture Martian
material and look for turbidity and pH change, but the idea died with him when
he fell off an ice cliff in Antartica in 1978.
Dear David, Because liquid water is unstable at the surface of Mars, few people
have considered doing what you suggest. What has been discussed is to include
culturing facilities with any Mars base we build so that astronauts who drill
into the deep subsurface (where liquid water could be present) will be able to
do what you suggest.
[ Sandy/NASAChatHost - 57 - 15:34:48 ]
EVERYONE: Jack will answer the remaining questions, but please do not send anymore
as he really does have to get back to work! Thanks :-)
[ JackFarmer/Exobiologist - 60 - 15:36:35
]
RE: [Marko-MarkoStahl/BadSchnbornGermany] Thermopilic
Archebacteria: Do they have a faster metabolism and faster reproduction than their
cooler relatives?
Dear Marko, Interesting question! One would expect that because of higher temperatures
and faster reaction rates, metabolic (and by implication growth) rates would be
faster at higher temperatures. But it is not that simple. The rate of doubling
depends primarily on nutrient availability. However, if nutrients are abundant,
then a faster doubling time could reasonably be expected.
[ Sandy/NASAChatHost - 61 - 15:36:39 ]
RE: [Marko-MarkoStahl/BadSchnbornGermany] Jack and
Sandy: Thank You very much.It was exciting as it was my very first chat at all!
Marko: So glad you could make it!! It must be quite late in Germany right now...
Join us again on Sept. 8 for a chat with Carol Stoker, project scientist for the
Marsokhod rover- http://quest.arc.nasa.gov/ltc/mars/index.html
[ JackFarmer/Exobiologist - 62 - 15:37:04
]
RE: [David-Mars2012/UniversityofCalifornia] Thanks
for chatting, Jack. We ought to do this more often
Thanks David. I enjoyed it too!
[ Sandy/NASAChatHost - 63 - 15:38:56 ]
EVERYONE: Join in another Quest Mars Chat with Marsokhod rover project scientist
Carol Stoker on Sept. 8 at 10 a.m, Pacific. To sign up for the chat go to-- http://quest.arc.nasa.gov/ltc/mars/index.html
[ JackFarmer/Exobiologist - 65 - 15:40:25
]
RE: [Bob-BobClark] Dr. Farmer, I saw the abstract
to your paper NEW TYPES OF BIOGENIC STRUCTURES IN MINERALS AND ROCKS FROM NONSEDIMENTARY
ENVIRONMENTS: FUTURE APPLICATION TO THE SEARCH FOR ANCIENT LIFE FORMS IN MARTIAN
ROCKS. I saw an image of one of the Mars meteorites suggestive of biogenic weathering.
Could you explain this method?
Dear Bob, We are hoping to show with this work that there is a fairly extensively
developed fossil record of subsurface life in lower temperature hydrothermal environments.
I'm not sure which work you are referring to re: biogenic weathering of meteorites,
but it is becoming clear that most meteorites have been substantially contaminated
by terrestrial microbes and that the colonizers do have a noteble effect on surface
textures of some minerals.
[ Sandy/NASAChatHost - 67 - 15:41:22 ]
RE: [Vince/Boeing-Vince/Boeing] Thanks Sandy and
Jack
Goodbye Vince! Thanks for you questions! Hope to chat with you again on Sept.
8!
[ Vince/Boeing-Vince/Boeing - 68 - 15:45:08 ]
I'll be there.
[ JackFarmer/Exobiologist - 69 - 15:46:03
]
Thanks to everyone for a fun chat. I'll be signing off now! Until next time, be
sure to keep the good questions in mind! Jack
[ Sandy/NASAChatHost - 71 - 15:48:03 ]
GOOD BYE EVERYONE! You sent in some great questions! We look forward to chatting
with you again in the very near future! http://quest.arc.nasa.gov/ltc/mars/index.html
[ Sandy/NASAChatHost - 72 - 15:50:27 ]
RE: [Bob-BobClark] Thank you very much Dr. Farmer
for your informative responses. I look forward to your next chat!
Bob: Jack will be chatting with us again in a couple of months. In the meantime,
see the rest of Quest's chat schedule at: http://quest.arc.nasa.gov/ltc