![]() ![]() ![]() |
PART 2: Survey coming: please help us PART 3: What's up in space PART 4: Greenhouse experiment needs extension cord PART 5: My First Trip to Moscow PART 6: Ups and downs of research PART 7: Fast equipment repair saves Mir experiment
In the last SMORE #4 message, we proposed an extension of the deadline for submitting your hardware designs. We received almost unanimous feedback saying an extension would be very helpful, so we'll go that way. Here then is a revised schedule for the activity: PART 1: Hardware design * Sep 22 - Nov 4: Classroom design of what is needed to grow plants in space; at conclusion, classes share designs for posting online. * Nov 6 - Nov 27: Discuss various ideas, debate good and bad points, try to reach consensus. * Nov 22 - Dec 6: Get feedback from experts, some interactions to help students see how their answers compared to NASA experts. PART 2: Data Sharing * Nov 1 - Dec 6: Conduct the STELLAR Shuttle/Mir Seed Germination Activity and submit results. * Dec 9 - Dec 22: Compare and discuss what may have caused different results. There is still time to get involved if you haven't yet gotten started. Seehttp://quest.arc.nasa.gov/smore/events/datashare.html for all the details. Some folks are in the process of finishing their designs and have been wondering how to submit their work (this is music to my ears). Here are details of how to send in your efforts once they are complete. The process differs depending on the format of your masterpiece and your abilities: * * * * * * * * * * IF YOUR DESIGN IS TEXT: Send it in the body of an email message to: lindac@quest.arc.nasa.gov * * * * * * * * * * IF YOUR DESIGN HAS PICTURES OR DIAGRAMS It is always our hope that material that comes from the classroom can be graphically represented on the web. There are several choices: If it already exists in electronic form, you can try enclosing the pictures in a MIME-compliant mail message (if you are familiar with how to do that using an email package like Eudora or Pine), or We can FTP it from a location you specify, or If it is already on a Web page, we can simply point to it. Please send Linda a note either with the goodies or with instructions on how to get at the material (FTP site or Web address). * * * * * * * * * * IF THESE FANCY DIGITAL TECHNIQUES WON'T WORK: Black and white diagrams can be Faxed to Linda Conrad at (415) 604-1913, or Material can be postal mailed to us. - Any text should be in electronic format (please put it on a disk) - Photos and art will be returned if you like Send you work to this address: Linda Conrad NASA Ames Research Center Mailstop T-28H Moffett Field, CA 94035 We would very much like to feature the work of your students on our NASA site. But we can only display your work if you send it....so please share! SURVEY COMING: PLEASE HELP US
Like most folks, we are held accountable for our work...often by our management. In a project like this (free to the user, without formal registration), it is sometimes hard to determine who our customers are, and how well we are serving them. To address these issues, we will be doing a voluntary registration for an eventual evaluation. We hope that no matter how you are involved, you will take a few moments to provide us with some basic information. We hope that everybody will respond. This includes the fully engaged teachers with classes of youngsters, to individuals reading these messages solely because of personal interest. No matter who you are, we hope you'll participate. Without meaningful data, it becomes difficult for us to justify these projects to our management. By week's end, you'll receive another mail message with the registration survey. But even better would be if you went to the Web form and provided basic information there. The address is:http://quest.arc.nasa.gov/smore/credits/survey.html The registration process should not take more then 3 minutes, and it will help us greatly. To further entice you, all registrants will be entered in a pool, and some will receive a gift pack of neato NASA pictures. Thanks in advance [Editor's note: this regular feature will report on the latest activities on board the Mir space station. The original source is NASA's Shuttle-Mir pages ] WHAT'S UP IN SPACE Mission Control Center -- Korolev October 11, 1996 U.S. astronaut John Blaha spent the week on Russia's Mir space station, continuing to collect data on a variety of experiments in the diverse portfolio of investigations assigned to him. Blaha concluded work with samples of the Binary Colloidal Alloy Tests (BCAT). The goal of the BCAT experiment is to grow crystals of two materials together over an extended time using a number of colloidal samples in a variety of concentrations. This week's samples were rapid growth samples which were allowed to grow for only 26 hours. Blaha started another sample at week's end, which is a slow growth sample. It is scheduled to grow for 90 days undisturbed in a Priroda module locker. Also this week, Blaha collected samples of the microbial environment around Mir, including the air, water, spacecraft surfaces and samples from the Mir crew members' skin. This research is aimed at understanding the microbial ecology of Mir including bacterial, fungi and some viruses. Routine operations continued with the BioTechnology System (BTS) with sample collection and replacement of growth media. BTS investigates cell attachment patterns and interactions among single cell cultures and varied cell cultures, the role of cells in forming functional tissue and other areas of interest. On Monday, Blaha will collect and fix (preserve with formaldehyde) samples of dwarf wheat from the Greenhouse experiment and prepared them for eventual return to Earth. Greenhouse is a set of experiments to study the effect of space flight on plant development. Plants may play a critical role in sustaining human life on future long space flights. Blaha has now settled into a scientific research routine on the Mir, itemizing and storing items from transfer bags which were transferred to the Mir from the shuttle Atlantis on the STS-79 mission. October 18, 1996 U.S. astronaut John Blaha began his second month aboard the Russian Mir Space Station, continuing his data collection and sample processing work under the NASA-Mir science program. Blaha completed the incubation of the microbial samples taken from crewmembers and surfaces in the Mir last week. Samples taken from the air, water, spacecraft surfaces and from the skin of the cosmonauts are being analyzed for bacteria, fungi and possible viruses. Also this week, Blaha performed the monthly photography of samples for the Diffusion- Controlled Crystallization Apparatus for Microgravity (DCAM). The DCAM slowly grows protein crystals under a semi-permeable membrane to produce samples which are compared to samples grown on Earth. Protein crystals are used in basic biological research, pharmacology and drug development. Space-grown crystals are larger and purer with fewer defects. Scientists working in the Russian mission control center quizzed Mir 22 Commander Valery Korzun, Flight Engineer Alexander Kaleri and Blaha this week on their interaction with one another and with ground controllers. Researchers are interested in observing any changes that occur in interpersonal relationships during long duration space missions. The cosmonauts also spent time working on the Metabolic Gas Analyzer System experiment. All three crew members participated in exercise sessions on the U.S. exercise bicycle, while hooked to equipment which measures their expired breath through a metabolic analyzer. The experiment measures individuals' metabolic responses to exercise and how they change overtime in orbit. Activities next week on the Mir will feature more work with the PAS --passive accelerometer system -- which Blaha will use to observe the motion of a small metallic ball as it travels down a narrow cylinder, giving researchers information on the amount of residual gravity present on the Mir. [Editor's note: Teri Schnepp is a payload scientist. She helps researchers develop their ideas for science experiments in space. She works with engineers to let them know how to build equipment for science projects. Teri holds many meetings in order to make sure everyone understands the requirements of the mission. See Teri's biography] GREENHOUSE EXPERIMENT NEEDS EXTENSION CORD Teri Schnepp August 5, 1996 We have been trying since 15 July to start the Greenhouse experiment. We've had some problems, some frustrations and happily some successes. In the problems department, it took the MIR crew a lot of time to find all the hardware pieces stored on the space station. After they found all our stuff, the next problem was that the power in the module was found to be insufficient to support our experiment and the life support systems for the crew. This was pretty frustrating. We couldn't understand why we were just finding out about the power problems, since we had been preparing for the experiment for years! A solution was found - a cable was located and attached to the SVET Greenhouse and then run across the hatch to an adjacent module. The cable is like a giant extension cord and it saved the day. Now the Greenhouse has power, (YEAH!!) and water is being added to the Root Module, in preparation for planting of the wheat seeds. The seed planting may have actually occurred today, 5 August, but we won't be sure until we hear about it through official channels. There is a frustrating part of our work...there is an 11-hour time difference between Moscow and California...so it takes a while to get information. We are spending many hours on the telephone with our Russian and US scientists, trying to gain information and keep everyone up to date on the progress of the experiment. We are excited that the seeds have OR will be soon planted. [Editor's note: in fact the seeds were planted on August 5] The next thing we will be looking for is seed germination in about a week after planting. [Editor's note: in fact, the plants sprouted on schedule and daily verbal reports of moisture probe data and logbook notations continued to track the experiment progress] [Editor's note: Steven Piert is an experiment support scientist. His job is to understand each investigator's experiment and the goals of the experiment, and to make sure the experiment is conducted in a manner that will meet these goals. He supports both Russian and American researchers. As part of his job, he traveled to Moscow as detailed below. See Steven's biography ] MY FIRST TRIP TO MOSCOW Steven J. Piert July 16, 1996 My first trip to Moscow was in February 1995. I went there with four other people from Ames Research Center to prepare the flight hardware to be used in the first joint U.S./Russian Incubator II experiment. The hardware was to be launched aboard a Russian Progress launch vehicle, where it would be transported to the Russian space station Mir, and returned aboard the shuttle Atlantis (Space Transportation System-71), after the first shuttle/Mir docking. There was snow on the ground when we arrived, but according to Muscovites, it had been a warm winter. One thing that surprised me was that the people were actually very friendly, helpful and extremely generous. I had been told to expect serious and reserved people, but this was not the case at all. When we weren't working at the Institute for Biomedical Problems, we were able to visit places such as Red Square, the Kremlin and the centuries old monastery at Zgorsk. It was easy to get around because of Moscow's excellent Metro system. This underground subway can take you just about anywhere in the city. Since my first trip, I've been back to Moscow two more times and hope to go again before the year is over. I really enjoy working with the Russian scientists and look forward to seeing more of the beautiful Russian country. [Editor's note: Patricia Cowings is a space researcher with a Ph.D. in psychology; she specializes in studying the relationship between mind and body. See Pat's biography] UPS AND DOWNS OF RESEARCH Patricia Cowings June 30, 1996 I've been conducting a series of experiments for space. I started working at Ames Research Center as a student in 1971. Then I came back to do postdoctoral work in 1973 and NASA actually hired me in 1978. In 1979 my experiment was accepted for space. It was a big thrill in my life. What we have developed over the last 25 years is a training procedure called Autogenic Feedback Training Exercise (AFTE). AFTE is a way in which people learn how to control up to 20 of their bodily responses so that they can keep themselves from getting sick due to motion sickness. I'm also the principal investigator for a series of space shuttle experiments in which we are attempting to test this treatment as a way of keeping astronauts from getting sick in space. The first time I would get to send it into space would be in 1984. Then the Challenger accident happened in 1986. The second time I was able to send it into space was in 1992. What NASA had originally agreed to in 1979 was to let me fly 16 subjects (eight who received the AFTE treatment and eight controls who took an alternative treatment), to complete the experiment. "Controls" means "control groups." A control group is a group that participates in the same activities as the test subjects. But the control group does not use the same kinds of treatments or exercises, like the AFTE. Instead, they have different or no treatments or exercises, and the results of these are compared to the results of the test subjects. Therefore, this kind of experiment could also be called a "controlled experiment." So far I've only flown three times and have data from space on three AFTE crew members and three controls, which are not enough data to evaluate the treatment effectiveness. However, the experiment was successful. The crew liked it. Things were working. But before the final report was completed, the experiment was canceled. No explanation was given whatsoever. No chance to defend the work. Nothing. Then my original laboratory was taken away and I was given a smaller one. These are the biggest frustrations of my work. I've spent the last three years talking with my colleagues in Russia since my experiment was canceled. They have invited this experiment to fly on the Mir Space Station and that's a real big plus for me. But even though this means my experiments will still fly, officially this is a Russian experiment. So, no money, no credit. But I'll still get the answers to my questions. [Editor's note: this unsigned article comes from the Shuttle-MIR web site FAST EQUIPMENT REPAIR SAVES MIR EXPERIMENT STS-79 is a story about cooperation - just as all Phase 1 shuttle missions have been. But one example of that cooperation among NASA teams and between American and Russian teams stands out in particular now that the fourth shuttle-Mir docking mission is complete. "It ain't Apollo 13," quipped Mission Scientist John Uri, "but from a scientist's perspective we pulled it off and saved that experiment." The story started the morning of Sept. 23 with the discovery by the Middeck Payload Operations Directors that one of the first powered payloads being transferred to Mir was not working correctly. The Biotechnology System- Cartilage (BTS-CART) experiment, designed to support three-dimensional growth of cartilage in microgravity, was transferred from the shuttle middeck to the Priroda module of the Mir Space Station on Flight Day 5. Several days later, as the shuttle was preparing to undock from Mir, the BTS-CART ground support team became concerned that the experiment was having hardware and/or software troubles when data from the flight unit and the ground-based version of the experiment didn't agree. "No one could understand the erratic data we were receiving," said Uri, who was the senior representative in the Payload Operations Support Area that morning. Any delay in their assessment of the health and status of the experiment could have resulted in a major loss of science data if it had not been fixed within a day or two, said JSC's Biotechnology Program Chief Scientist Steve Gonda. "Any time you have a biological system, there are time-critical constraints on keeping it the right temperature, feeding it the right nutrients, removing waste," Gonda said, "and that depends upon the operation of the experiment control computer that monitors those parameters through in-line sensors." So, Lockheed-Martin's Lead MPOD Lynn Pickett, Biotechnology Program Integration Manager Dianne Byerly and their team asked Mission Specialist Jay Apt to take Electronic Still Camera photographs of the cartilage constructs through the experiment viewport so that they could be compared with the ground-based experiment. Apt took several photographs of the exterior configuration of the bovine cartilage-growing experiment, but he was unable to take any close-up photographs through the viewport window because of a broken interior light. Nevertheless, Apt downlinked the images using the Orbiter Communications Assembly. While awaiting downlink and processing of the ESC images, the BTS ground team worked intensely on troubleshooting procedures that would need to be delivered to John Blaha, now residing on Mir--the only crew member trained to perform them. The BTS team went through procedure just as Blaha would perform it, and wrote up in flight note. Uri said the team knew it was running out of time but didn't have communications through the Mir air-to-ground channels. Clearing that hurdle of getting the instructions to Blaha was next. Direct communication between Mission Control-Moscow and Mir wouldn't be available for several hours, so the BTS ground team started working with Mission Control-Houston to arrange uplink of the necessary malfunction procedures through the shuttle communications link. With hatches almost ready to be closed, the ground team working on the troubleshooting procedures also started to consider the possibility of transferring the equipment back to Atlantis for return to the Earth. The team generated its repair message and sent it to Blaha, who performed the procedures, but the hardware and software did not respond as hoped. At that point on Flight Day 8, the hatches had to be closed so that Atlantis could undock from Mir. This meant there could be no further assistance from the shuttle crew. But the shuttle still could be used in the trouble-shooting effort - this time as a communications relay station. Using Atlantis' second air-to-ground communications link (A/G-2) communications link, scientists and technicians in the POSA, the Houston control center for the Mir Science Payloads Team, were able to call Blaha with further troubleshooting procedures. In the meantime, the ESC photographs had been processed by Phyllis Grounds and her team in the Payload Operations Control Center of Bldg. 30S. Dianne Valdez and Cara White of JSC's Digital Imaging Lab processed the images normally. Then, John Salmon, an ESC software developer for Lockheed- Martin, enhanced the photographs enough to show the status of the cartilage constructs inside the experiment hardware. "When we got the download, I knew they were waiting for the pictures, so I put off processing the other pictures (a total of 394 were downlinked during the flight) until they got what they needed," Salmon said. It Salmon took just 30 to 45 minutes to process the images once they were delivered by the OCA team. "We had the payload guys hovering behind John and saying 'Let's zoom in on this here," Grounds said. Allen Moore, support contractor Krug Life Science's lead engineer for the BTS facility, saw in the photos that a control and data cable on the unit was not fully locked in place by the locking mechanism. While the BTS team drew up another procedure to power down the equipment so that the cable could be re-mated without damaging the system, the shuttle undocked from Mir and began its fly-around of the Russian Space Station. During the fly-around, John Blaha called from the Mir via the shuttle communications link to report that further attempts to fix the problems had been failed. The air-to-ground relay was enabled again to allow the POSA in Houston to discuss the suspect cable connection, since communication directly from Russia was still unavailable. They arrived at a solution, but the repair procedures still had to be approved by Mission Control-Moscow before they could be voiced up to Blaha. While this was being explained, air-to-ground communication between Moscow and Mir, via the shuttle, was suddenly acquired, and Bill Gerstenmaier, leading the U.S. consultants group in Russia, excitedly broke in to announce that the procedures were approved by the Russian shift flight director. It was about 6:50 p.m. by then, and Gerstenmaier and Uri both talked with Blaha directly through the communications relay. It took longer to read up the 15-minute procedure than it would take Blaha to perform it. After completing the repair, Blaha called down to report that the cable connection had, indeed, been the problem and that BTS-CART - one of his favorite experiments -- was functioning properly. "The whole team was up in Mission Ops and when John went through the procedure we had voiced up to test the coupling and reported that all parameters came up and were nominal, there was a shout of joy that everyone voiced," Gonda recalled. "Now we were ready to take that first long step of a 140-day long-duration cell culture, and it is a giant step for our program." STS-79 Lead Flight Director Paul Dye said the flight control team always tries to keep A/G-2 available as a relay option because it makes up for lack of coverage through Russian communications systems. The MCC-Houston team was happy to support the effort as long as the relay wasn't a distraction for Commander Bill Readdy and Pilot Terry Wilcutt as they performed the fly-around. "The entire episode illustrated the incredible levels of cooperation that have been achieved among the many ground support teams within Mission Control-Houston, as well as international cooperation between Houston, Moscow and the shuttle and Mir crews," said Phase 1 Program Manager Frank Culbertson. The entire process, from problem identification to solution, took only nine hours. "This is one of the most incredible examples of cooperation across the ocean," Uri said. "There were no brick walls. Nobody said 'no.' Everybody was working toward the same goal and everybody understood what that was. It saved the experiment and it was all done in real time and it really sets an example for the future. I came home from work that night and told my wife, 'Now I know why I work at NASA.'" Note: As this project has officially ended, these and other inactivehttp://quest.arc.nasa.gov/smore/updates |
||||