 |
      
      
  

  
|
|
This material was developed for the Live From Mars project
by Passport to Knowledge. Live
From Mars was a precursor to Mars Team Online.
Teachers' Guide
 
Activity 5.2: Sun, Shadows, Surface Structure... and the Face on Mars
Teacher Background
As we've seen, one of the most enduring beliefs about Mars is that it
once was inhabited. Remember the 19th century mania about canals and the
alluring fiction of H.G. Wells and Orson Welles? Since the Viking mission,
some people think they can see new physical evidence of a past civilization
on Mars: they interpret images of one particular area as showing a face--a
kind of monumental structure rather like the Sphinx and Pyramids of ancient
Egypt. Most scientists are very skeptical about this, and argue that the
face is just a trick of the light playing on natural surface formations.
Still public interest remains. This Activity uses the face as a way to
dramatize the kind of image interpretation planetary geologists must do
to account for illumination angles before they can determine surface structure.
It also serves as an antidote to contemporary wishful-thinking which echoes
Percival Lowell's now discredited beliefs. Armed with experience in image
analysis, students (and their parents) can better make up their own minds
about the face, the pyramids, the library and other fabulous monuments
on Mars.
Objective
Students will use light and shadow information to make inferences regarding
the three dimensional shapes of specific objects photographed on the surface
of Mars.
Students will explain the limitation of some data in reaching definitive
conclusions about the shape of the specified objects.
Students will explain what further data would be needed to more precisely
describe the three dimensional shape of the objects.
Materials: For each student or team of students
a 1 x 3 x 6 inch piece of modeling clay
a bright light source that can cast
sharp shadows in a darkened room
two rulers
a protractor
|
a transparent grid overlay
copy of Image A
copy of Image B
a video camera, if available
copies of Shadow Patterns 1-5
|
Vocabulary
image
angle
ratio
shadow
elevation
depression |
Engage
Procedure
Tell students that they are on an Imaging Team whose task is to interpret
the first images sent back to Earth from a planetary probe to an unknown
world. Distribute copies of Shadow Pattern 1A to students. Explain that
this is a simulated image from an orbiting spacecraft of a planetary
surface feature and that the dark area is a shadow cast by the surface
feature. Ask them to write down what they think is the actual shape
of the feature. Tally answers on the board. Distribute copies of Shadow
Pattern 1B. Again, pose the same question. Tally answers on the board.
(If they seem to need a clue, tell them that the surface features are
either a dome shaped mountain or a bowl shaped crater.) Allow time for
discussion and re-evaluation of their original guesses. Then reveal
to students that without an additional piece of information, there is
no way they can conclusively state the answer.
Suggested URLs
http://barsoom.msss.com/education/facepage/face.html
http://barsoom.msss.com/education/happy_face/happy_face.html
Explore/Explain
Procedure
1. Explain to students that without knowing the direction of the incoming
light they don't really know whether the surface feature in question
is a mountain or a bowl shaped crater with no rim.
2. To illustrate, complete the following demonstration: Using two
3-D models (one of a mountain and one of a rimless bowl shaped crater)
in a darkened room, hold the light source at nearly right angles to
the surface of the clay (as would happen if the sun was low in the sky).
First hold the light right and then left of each feature and refer to
Shadow Patterns 1A and 1B as you do this. Show students that relative
to the same incoming light, a shadow cast by the mountain differs from
that cast by the crater. Explain that when scientists examine new images
of planetary features from orbiting spacecraft, they must take the viewing
angle of the spacecraft and the angle of the sun into account. If they
don't, the images may be misinterpreted. Also note that the images from
spacecraft are 2-D renderings of 3-dimensional objects and the way something
looks often depends on the angle from which we are viewing it and the
angle of incoming light.
3. Distribute Shadow Patterns 2 and 3, pieces of modeling clay and
light sources to teams of students. Tell them that in each Shadow Pattern
image the arrow indicates the direction of the incoming sunlight and
the letter "N" indicates the direction North. For each pattern, challenge
them to discover the direction the sun would appear in the sky if they
were standing on the surface of the planet where the feature is located
and the approximate shape of the surface feature. Have students model
the surface features with their clay and reproduce the shadow patterns
using their light sources. Have teams verify each others' models.
4. Once students have mastered the above, distribute Shadow Pattern
4A. Ask them to determine the direction of the sun in the sky if they
were on the surface of the planet, and the nature and shape of the surface
features casting these shadows. Write their hypotheses on the board
and discuss.
| 5. Distribute copies of Shadow Pattern 4B. Explain
that this is an image of the same region on the planet but taken
about 12 hours later. Ask students to determine the direction of
the sun if they were on the surface when the image was taken. Tell
them to examine this image and compare it to the one taken 12 hours
earlier. Each team should discuss what physical feature(s) might
be represented by the shadows in 4A and 4B, then construct a model
using light sources and clay. Teams can verify each others' models.
6. Distribute copies of Shadow Pattern 5A and again ask teams
to determine the direction of the sun in the sky and guess the
shape and nature of the surface features casting the shadow. (Note:
A variety of correct answers are possible based on only this one
image.) After various possibilities are formulated and discussed,
tell students that you have inside information that at the time
this image was taken the sun was rather high in the eastern sky
and the surface features in question are actually a series of
straight and narrow trenches in the surface of the planet. Three
of these trenches run East and West and are the same length. The
fourth trench runs North and South and is about half the length
of the others. Using this information, ask teams to model these
trenches and shadow patterns using clay and light sources. Next,
ask students what the shadow pattern created by these trenches
would look like if the sun were lower in the planet's eastern
sky when the image was taken. Have teams recreate this with light
sources and clay. After teams have shared their models, reveal
the correct answer (Shadow Pattern 5B). Explain that while this
example was clearly contrived for the purpose of humor, the point
made is a very important one: surface features can take on very
different appearances depending on the direction and height of
the incoming sunlight and that more than one image is often needed
to accurately deduce the nature of a planetary surface feature.
Without such help, the eye and brain can easily be deceived!
|
The Face on Mars:
Tools to Explore the Viking images MGS's camera was designed
by Michael Malin, who is not only an ingenious researcher, but also
a scientist of wide interests, ranging from Mars to Antarctica.
(see biographical excerpt on p. 6) His company, Malin Space Science
Systems, will be handling all the image processing for MGS and supporting
public education and access. One of Malin's goals is to help people
understand complex phenomena with the best of today's tools. His
fascinating home pages provide ways to explore the Face on Mars
for yourself: here a sampler of what you can find at: http://barsoom.msss.com/
education/facepage/face.html In July, 1976, Viking Orbiter 1
was acquiring images of the Cydonia region of Mars as part of the
search for potential landing sites for Viking Lander 2. On 25 July,
1976, it photographed a region of buttes and mesas along the escarpment
that separates heavily cratered highlands to the south from low
lying, relatively crater-free, lowland plains to the north. Among
the hills was one that, to the Viking investigators scrutinizing
the images for likely landing sites, resembled a face ...Subsequent
to this release, some people have argued, mostly in the lay literature,
that the face-like hill is artificially shaped. Although their argument
has been expanded to a host of nearby features, none commands public
interest like the "Face." Malin's page will provide interested persons
with both the raw Viking images, transformed to GIF format, and
a brief tutorial (with examples) of image processing techniques
applied to create "better looking" images.
Not everybody agrees with Malin's interpretations. Here is another
viewpoint by Mark Carlotto.
|
| 7. Distribute copies of Image A and B. Explain to
students that these are two actual images of Mars taken by the Viking
orbiters. Explain that Image B is an enlargement of a section of
Image A, but taken at a different time of day on Mars. Challenge
students to draw a square inside Image A to show the area covered
by Image B. Then ask students to draw an arrow next to Image A to
indicate the direction of the incoming rays of the sun at the time
this picture was taken. Have them do the same for Image B. Verify
their results. Finally, have them create a model of the terrain
shown in Figure A.
8. Discuss how they would figure out the height or depth of
the elevations or depressions. Students should realize that they
do not have enough information for a definitive answer. They must
also know the height of the sun above the horizon at the location
of each surface feature and the length of the shadow to know how
high or deep the surface features really are. Lead students to
a realization of this important point by having them experiment
with the length of shadows cast by a ruler. Have them stand a
ruler on edge by sticking it in a piece of modeling clay and record
the length of the shadow cast by the light when it is held directly
over the ruler (at 90°--to the top of the desk or table top--at
60°, 45°, 30° and 10°).
9. Distribute the transparent grid overlays and have students
return to Shadow Patterns 2, 3 and 4. Tell them the grids they
have just received are a measuring scale for their spacecraft
images. From the height of the spacecraft above the planetary
surface, it has been determined that each square on the grid is
exactly three square miles. For each Shadow Pattern, tell them
the elevation angle of the sun above the horizon and ask them
to calculate the approximate height or depth of the surface feature
creating each shadow.
10. Finally, challenge students to use their modeling clay,
their light sources and the class video camera to create shapes
that cast different shadows and make the overall shape look different
when the incoming light comes from varying angles and varying
directions. Have teams of students secretly record their modeled
shapes with the video camera and then challenge the other students
to figure out the actual shape of the modeled clay by trying to
duplicate the shape with a piece of clay themselves. Each team,
as they challenge the rest of the students can offer clues (e.g.
the direction and elevation angle of the incoming light).
|
Expand/Adapt/Connect
Younger students love shadow play. This entire exercise can
be done qualitatively with them. They can be led to see that lower
angles make longer shadows. They may also want to note the length
of their own shadows vs. their own height as well as the direction
of their own shadows in the playground at different times during
the school day.
With older students, teachers can make the exercise more quantitative
by plotting angle vs. shadow length or introducing simple trigonometry
and then challenging students to calculate the height or depth
of a surface feature based on the elevation angle of the incoming
sunlight. Older students can even use a flag pole to create a
sun dial. Have them mark the length and direction of the shadow
that the flagpole casts at various times during the school day.
By measuring the angular height of the sun, they can calculate
the height of the flag pole and come to a good understanding of
how the sun travels across the sky of Earth (or Mars). Doing the
experiment in December vs. March vs. June will also dramatically
demonstrate how height, rising and setting points of the sun change
during different seasons on Earth (and Mars). Students can create
tables to indicate whether the length of the ruler's shadow in
inches is a function of the elevation angle of the light. Thus,
for example, they will see that length of the ruler's shadow equals
the height of the ruler when the elevation angle of the light
is 45 degrees and that the shadow is about twice as long as the
ruler is high when the elevation angle of the light is about 27
degrees, etc.)
Students may download the Face on Mars image (see URL, p. 53),
taken by the Viking spacecraft in 1976, along with images of this
same feature created by a computer simulating the sun coming from
other directions. Students may prepare an oral presentation to
the class on what they think the object really looks like. Research
and report on the public debate surrounding this image. Students
may be challenged to recreate the Face on Mars in 3-dimensions
from the information contained in the on-line images. They should
use their modeling clay, light source and the video camera in
the process.
Download the image of the "Happy Face" on Mars. Is it also the
work of an intelligent, optimistic, ancient Martian civilization?
Have
students debate whether, because of the wide interest in the Face
on Mars, NASA should target this area for any special coverage.
Does popular interest (public = taxpayers) overrule scientists'
confidence that the Face is merely a natural formation? (ed. NASA
Administrator Dan Goldin recently told a very persistent questioner
that he, Goldin, was sure the questioner was wrong, but that the
public did have the right to see the best images of the site,
if NASA could obtain them without compromising its science mission,
which seemed a responsive and responsible answer.)
|
|
|