Header Bar Graphic
Shuttle Image and IconAerospace HeaderBoy Image
Spacer TabHomepage ButtonWhat is NASA Quest ButtonSpacerCalendar of Events ButtonWhat is an Event ButtonHow do I Participate ButtonSpacerBios and Journals ButtonSpacerPics, Flicks and Facts ButtonArchived Events ButtonQ and A ButtonNews ButtonSpacerEducators and Parents ButtonSpacer
Highlight Graphic
Sitemap ButtonSearch ButtonContact Button

UPDATE #11 - February 13, 1998

PART 1: Upcoming Chat
PART 2: Planning a Simulator Study
PART 3: Week Two - Model Checkout in the Wind Tunnel
PART 4: Subscribing & Unsubscribing: How to do it


Thursday, February 19, 10:00 a.m.-11:00 a.m. Pacific Time:
Ray Oyung, Research Coordinator for the Fatigue Countermeasures
For registration information go to
Ray's studying the effects of sleep loss and jet lag on pilots.
Read his biography prior to joining this chat.

Chat with Christopher J. "Gus" Loria (Major, USMC)
NASA Astronaut Candidate (Pilot) Time and Date to be
announced. Gus is here to fly the Vertical Motion Simulator
the world's largest simulator.  He will be flying the latest simulation of
the shuttle orbitor.
Read his bio at http://www.jsc.nasa.gov/Bios/htmlbios/loria.html

[Editor's Note: Ray Oyung is the Research Coordinator for the Fatigue Countermeasures Program. He is studying the effect of sleep loss on pilots. Read his bio at http://quest.arc.nasa.gov/aero/team/ray.html ]

Planning a Simulator Study

by Ray Oyung

February 11, 1998

A Congressional request was presented to NASA Ames Research Center in 1980
to investigate safety issues with pilot fatigue in transmeridian flight.

In response to this request, the NASA Ames Fatigue/Jet Lag Program was
created to collect systematic, scientific information on fatigue, sleep,
circadian rhythms, and performance in flight operations. Three program
goals were established and continue to guide research efforts: to
determine the extent of fatigue, sleep loss and circadian disruption in
flight operations; to determine the impact of these factors on flight crew
performance; and to develop and evaluate countermeasures to mitigate the
adverse effects of these factors and maximize flight crew performance and

In 1991, the name of the program was changed to the Fatigue
Countermeasures Program to provide a greater emphasis on the development
and evaluation of countermeasures.

Currently, the program is in the process of designing a simulation study
to see what can be done to help pilots stay alert during the times when
most of us are asleep. With so many "red eye" commercial flights and
overnight packages that absolutely, positively must be at the destination
the following day, this issue of alertness management becomes more

Our group just met again today to talk about scheduling, staffing, and
equipment requirements for this study. Boeing 747-400 pilots need to be
recruited to "fly" the full motion simulator which looks like a big white
box on the outside standing about 20 feet above the floor with a bunch of
hydraulic arms that connect the box to the ground. Hundreds of wires
connect the box to computers in another room that run the simulator.
Inside, this box looks just like the flight deck of a Boeing 747-400
parked on the ramp at an airport. All the controls, glass displays, knobs,
and furniture are exactly what you'd see in the real thing. This type of
simulator is used in flight training facilities to train/familiarize
pilots into different types of airplanes. If sitting inside while fully
operational, the simulator feels just like you're inside a real airplane.
The hydraulics provide signals to the kinesthetic and vestibular systems.
The monitors depict a view 180 degrees of what would be seen outside. The
computers generate graphics that look so real that even if the simulator
were not in motion and someone was flying, you'd have a tendency to lean
over when turning!

The simulator is an invaluable tool that we can use to assist us in
answering the questions we may have on a specific research project without
the danger of harming someone or something in the air or on the ground.

In our study, we want to see how effective a countermeasure will be to
assist a pilot in maintaining alertness during a flight at night between
two and eight o'clock in the morning. Several factors play a role in
alertness during a flight this time of night. How many hours has the pilot
been awake before this flight? Has the pilot been on a night work schedule
or day work schedule over the last few weeks? How old is this person? Does
this person tend to be more of a morning type or an evening type?

No matter what the background is of the individual, we are looking at ways
to help all pilots maintain vigilance during these times when most of us
are asleep.

[Editor's Note: Fanny is the Project Manager for an upcoming test of a future supersonic airliner. She has written several journals about the preparations for this test. See them online with pictures at http://quest.arc.nasa.gov/aero/events/test.html ]

Week Two - Model Checkout in the Wind Tunnel

by Fanny Zuniga

January 30, 1998

We are in the most demanding phase of our test. Getting started!
This week everything was going on at once as we try to get everything
ready. This is one time where I wish there were at least three of me.
Some people are getting the model ready, others, the tunnel. Others,
are setting up drawing programs on the computer so we can plot
data. Still others, setting up cameras. Still other are safety
training before we turn on the tunnel. Everyone is checking everything.
You get the idea. I want to describe at least some of all this, so this
will probably be the longest journal entry I write. By the way, there is a
spot in this web site for you to ask questions about my wind
tunnel test. http://quest.arc.nasa.gov/aero/events/test.html

The name of the game this week was making sure our measurements are
accurate and repeatable before we spend a lot of time collecting data. Why
spend so much time on this, you ask? Let's start with accuracy. This means
we want to make sure that if we repeat a run in the wind tunnel three
times in a row, we will get the same results each time. This tells us that
all instruments (balance, etc) are working properly. What if your bathroom
scale was off by up to 10 pounds each time you stepped on it? How about if
it had only 1 pound of error? 1/20 of a pound? In a test like ours, we
have to make sure we get data that is accurate enough to answer the
questions we are researching. For example, which flap angle works the
best? Which type of flap works the best? What angle of attack is the best
for landing this type of plane? Since this is a scale model, each pound of
Lift on the model is equal to a lot of Lift (up to 40 pounds!) on the real
airplane, so you can imagine we have to be pretty accurate in measuring
aerodynamic forces on this model.

And what about repeatablity? Sometimes our sensitive electrical equipment
fails or changes over time. So we occasionally repeat certain standard
conditions (called "baselines") throughout the entire test to make sure
nothing has changed. We have to be very sure our data is reliable so that
we can compare runs made at different times during a test. For example, we
may want to compare the Lift and Drag of two different types of flaps but
the actual runs could be made weeks apart, depending on when it is
sensible for us to change the flaps. We can come rerun baseline conditions
any time we want to make sure all our electrical systems are healthy.

Let me put this another way. If you set two watches to the same time, and
a week later they read differently, which one would YOU trust? How would
you make sure which one, if either, was correct? Hopefully you can
see how much work it takes to make sure the data we collect is good data.
When its possible, we make several measurements of the same thing to help
make sure everything is working. We can't do this with the balance,
though. So we'll spend part of this second week making sure we are ready
to start exploring some of our questions about this airplane. We hoped it
would go quickly so we could get on to the interesting stuff.

Monday (January 26): We ran into some trouble right from the start. See,
there's this electric motor that moves the rear post to tilt the model up
and down. Well, this motor creates electronic noise when it runs, which
then interferes with the signal coming from the balance (like when you get
a bad connection on your phone). We found this out because with the wind
off, and nobody touching the model, our balance ouputs (Lift and Drag)
were drifting all over. Big problem! This is has to get fixed before we
start research runs.

We finally closed up the model and ran the wind tunnel near Midnight for a
"shakedown" run at low speed! This is one of my favorite moments in a
test, because this was the first time I got to see our model look like a
real airplane. I sure hope to see these flying someday soon. Maybe I'll
fly in it too! We are still making last-minute changes to our computer
programs, and still having trouble making our tufts stick to the model.

Tuesday: We spent most of the two shifts today fixing the noise problem.
Meanwhile, there's plenty of other work going on. Some of the team are not
sorry we have a problem with the balance, it gives them time to catch
up on other stuff.

Wednesday: We were able to minimize the interference problem, at least
enough to move on in our test. We decided to do another checkload now that
the problem had been fixed, so we hung weights off the model one last
time (hopefully). A bunch of other minor problems popped up, got solved,
and we went on to run the tunnel again. This time we got our first decent
data. Now we can begin the process of gaining enough confidence in all
of our measurements that we feel comfortable proceeding with the rest of
the experiment.

Thursday: Today we made a bunch of runs to check our accuracy. We checked
out various speeds and model angles of attack. We uncovered a bunch of new
minor problems. For example, there are little electric heaters that
keep the pressure modules at a constant temperature. Well, the heaters
died and we had to fix them. But our balance data was looking OK, so we
pressed on to establish that "baseline" I told you about.

Another part of getting our baseline, and being confident in our accuracy,
is figuring out how long we should "sample" our balance signal to record a
data point. Let me explain this English. At every speed and angle of
attack, we will record the balance signal to measure Lift and Drag (and a
few other forces as well). But the wind in the tunnel is turbulent (mostly
from the big fan that pushes the air around the tunnel) so the model is
bouncing around a little. You can actually see the model wiggling if you
watch it on the video cameras. So we "sample" the electrical signal for a
few seconds and average it out to get a single data point to store on the
computer. We are making several runs to determine how long we need to
sample the data to get a good average.

Friday: As part of our baselines, we were running at higher and higher
load conditions; like higher speed and higher angle of attack. We had a
new problem. This time its where the model was shaking enough to rub up
against the supporting posts. We call this "fouling". This means we can't
trust our force measurements. Its like you are standing on a bathroom
scale to get weighed, but you're leaning on a counter while you are doing
it. Not good. Eventually, we decided to file away some metal to enlarge
the opening in the model where the posts go inside to hold onto the

Friday night, we ran the tunnel again and still got some fouling of the
model against the mounting posts. We didn't know where the fouling was
occuring, so we decided to simulate the loads that caused the foul when
the wind was on. To do this, we rotated the test section, rolled the
yellow crane back into the test section, and used the crane to "lift" up
on the model to simulate Lift loads. We found the problem, which was fixed
while most of us went to dinner. We then loaded the model with the crane
again, and it looked like we fixed the problem and
were ready to go.

Saturday Night (Saturday Night?!?!): By Friday we were pretty far behind
on our testing; we wanted to be done with this checkout phase early in the
week. We got some volunteers to run tonight to make up some time. We had
trouble with tunnel instruments and data system for the first 5 hours into
our shift. We finally got running and finished Thursday's effort to
determine how long we should sample the data . We picked 4 seconds
for every data point (every angle of attack).

If this is your first message from the updates-aero list, welcome!

To catch up on back issues, please visit the following Internet URL:

To subscribe to the updates-aero mailing list (where this message
came from), send a message to:
In the message body, write only these words:
   subscribe updates-aero


To remove your name from the updates-aero mailing list, send a
message to:
In the message body, write only these words:
   unsubscribe updates-aero

Footer Bar Graphic
SpacerSpace IconAerospace IconAstrobiology IconWomen of NASA IconSpacer
Footer Info